This axiom seems like a companion to 1.A1 in the way of Spinoza's
parallelism of the mind and the body. One key question is whether this parallelism is
employing "a view from nowhere" or "a view from somewhere." The verb used here is "conceive" or concipi which typically signifies a "view from nowhere." It may be that this is irrelevant as an axiom because Spinoza is simply outlining the operation of logic rather than content as in the definitions. If so, it would make sense to use the "view from nowhere" verbs, but not be pointing to substance versus attributes.
Id quod per aliud not potest concipi, per se concipi debet.
Translated as,
That which cannot be conceived through another, must be conceived through itself.
Tuesday, March 10, 2020
Spinoza's Ethics: I.A2: Knowing
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Spinoza's Ethics: III.P47
Lætitia quæ ex eo oritur quod scilicet rem quam odimus destrui aut alio malo affici imaginamur, non oritur absque ulla animi tristitia. Joy ...
-
This proposition is important to thoroughly understand. As discussed in earlier posts on Book II, Spinoza is presenting reality through tw...
-
Nec corpus mentem ad cogitandum nec mens corpus ad motum neque ad quietem nec ad aliquid (si quid est) aliud determinare potest. And the bod...
-
Here at the beginning of definitions, we ponder the nature of beginning. Almost everything that exists seems to have a start or a beginning...
No comments:
Post a Comment